I totally agree with you Marv. I am quite new here, and I have been mostly lurking, but frankly, I had no idea this was supposed to be a "pro-Gary" site, other than for the gaming ideas and games he created.Finarvyn wrote:Bat, I guess I'm sort of with you on this one. Mike has asked several times for Gene's qualifications and/or background in order to be an expert and Gene comes back with comments that never actually address Mike's questions but instead belittle Mike for even asking. Gene is revered here but I'll be honest that I don't know his background, either. At least Mike can post a large list of gaming products that he's worked on (and many of which I own) and can show that he's been in the industry for years.BlackBat242 wrote:Gene, it seems to me most (if not all) of the "baiting" was performed by you, so no sympathy here. I've seen you do it before, and gritted my teeth then, as now.
Overall, I find it kind of sad that Knights & Knaves Alehouse has been somewhat dormant for months (I check occasionally and not much seems to happen here) and then threads like this explode and posts fly almost faster than I can read them. Honestly, I had no idea that there was so much gamer-hatred here. I always hear about those evil morons at ENWorld and places like that, but I didn't expect to see so much of it here.
Is this supposed to be a "pro-Gary" site? I always thought it was an "old school gaming" site with focus on OD&D and 1E AD&D (which are my favorite editions, by the way) and knew that there was a lot of 3E hatred, but I always assumed that the 1E-2E guys stuck together.
Has the 2E hatred been a part of the K&K manifesto from the start? How could I miss that?
I had lots of exchanges with Gary, he seemed to me a nice person; he even sent me postcards from his home in exchange for some italian playing cards I sent him. We also talked about topics other than games, and more often than not I did not agree with him, and some of his ideas I did not like at all.
Honestly, I do not care much about what happened at TSR, or how Gary behaved at the time. He was a man like everyone, not a saint, so he (like me and most everyone else) may have made errors in his life, and probably regretted them.
Now, it does not seem to me that Mike is being critic on Gary's game design credits, but he seems to be "in the know" for what happened at TSR back in the day, so he may have witnessed aspects of Gary's life which are not well known. If for no other reason that no one else here can confirm nor deny what he is saying (except by spitting bile like Mr. Weigel is doing), it could all be taken at least with the benefit of doubt.
The seemingly personal attacks on Mr. Cook that some here have shown, like they knew what happened or knew the men, do not deserve any attention. Either these people were there and knew the facts (and could prove it), or it would be better for them to shut up. They would make a better figure.
And honestly? A person who craps on another person's taste in matter of games is sincerely quite juvenile if not pathetic. I like 2e, and I like 1e, and I am 37 years old with a wife and son, and I guess I can decide if I like something and whether this something is fun for me. I do not need any supposed "expert" to tell me how to have fun, or worse yet, if I am having "wrongbadfun". If for no other reason than bring new players to the game, it would be wiser to not deride them. I recently met a group of young players (the oldest is 25), who only know how to play 3e and 4e. Granted, I do not like those games, but I have not told them that they were "wrong" or whatever. Instead, I invited them to play with me with AD&D 1e. I showed them that there are other games out there, that the D&D of the past was quite different from what they use to play, and that the experience of playing is quite different. And you know what? They liked it! I do not think I would have got the same answer if I had crapped on their game, or told them that their games sucked or whatever. If AD&D 1e must be remembered as a good game, those who introduce it should know better than being dismissive of other's tastes.
Antonio