New classes

Questions and discussion about AD&D rules, classes, races, monsters, magic, etc.
Post Reply
User avatar
AxeMental
Uber-Grognard
Posts: 15108
Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2005 7:38 am
Location: Florida

New classes

Post by AxeMental »

I believe Gygax encourages DMs to create magic items, and even to create new monster types (someplace in the DMG I believe it states or suggests this). But does anyone know if Gygax envisioned DMs creating new classes for players to take? Is this stated anyplace in the DMG for instance? From Dragon Mag, I get the impression that Gygax would have been very open to this idea (look at all the goofball ideas Dragon threw out there over the years). But then again, Dragon was a product that needed to be sold to make money, and in that case Gygax might have been supportive to meet the bottom line. I do recall some saying that EGG was worried about drift in 0E and hence created a more solidified and complete 1E (so that each table was pretty much on the same page).

My guess is that he wouldn't have approved early on, but that position would have changed by UA.
"I prefer dangerous freedom over peaceful slavery."
Thomas Jefferson in letter to Madison

Back in the days when a leopard could grab and break your Australopithecus (gracile or robust) nek and drag you into the tree as a snack, mankind has never had a break"
** Stone Giant

User avatar
sepulchre
Uber-Grognard
Posts: 1188
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 3:15 pm
Location: Baltimore, Maryland

Re: New classes

Post by sepulchre »

On the one hand, judging his work on the Greyhawk and demi-human clerics in the Glossography (some of that reprinted in U.A) I believe he favored tweaking the basic classes (in this case the cleric): clerics who are devoted to the god of death may achieve 1 lvl. as an assassin for every 3 as a cleric etc. In some cases this is expressed as an experience point penalty of 10%/lvl while in other instances the cleric is not penalized in anyway.

Certainly, he favored subclasses too, but I doubt he would have supported moving beyond the basic four classes in AD&D.
I think over again my small adventures. My fears, those small ones that seemed so big, for all the vital things I had to get and to reach, and yet, there is only one great thing, the only thing, to live to see the great day that dawns, and the light that fills the world. - Old Inuit Song

“Superstitions are religious forms surviving the loss of ideas. Some truth no longer known or a truth which has changed its aspect is the origin and explanation of all. The name from the Latin, superstes, signfies that which survives, they are the dead remnants of old knowledge or opinion” - Eliphas Levi (138 The History of Magic).

“Let no one wake a man brusquely for it is a matter difficult of cure if the soul find not its way back to him”, the Upanishads of ancient India ( 58 Our Oriental Heritage, Durant).

"Life is intrinsically, well, boring and dangerous at the same time. At any given moment the floor may open up. Of course, it almost never does; that's what makes it so boring" – Edward Gorey.

"The bright day is done and we are for the dark" - Shakespeare

"No lamp burns till morning" - Persian proverb.

“The living close the eyes of the dead, but it is the dead that open the eyes of the living”— Old Slavic saying.

'The best place to hide a light is in the sun' – old Arab proverb.

'To thee, thou wedding-guest!
He prayeth well who loveth well
Both man and bird and beast.
He prayeth best who loveth best,
All things both great and small:
For the dear God, who loveth us,
He made and loveth all' - Samuel Taylor Coleridge (VII Rhyme of the Ancient Mariner).

User avatar
rogatny
Uber-Grognard
Posts: 4754
Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2005 2:47 pm
Contact:

Re: New classes

Post by rogatny »

I think this is one of those cases where we have to remember Gygax's distinction between "D&D" and "AD&D." I think as the standardized version of the rules, "AD&D" is a much smaller subset of "D&D" and that to be "AD&D" to Gygax, it should contain all those things not explicitly labeled as optional in the PHB. It could however contain additional things beyond what was in the PHB and still be "AD&D."

Thus, if you remove all the sub classes (optional) and add a few of your own subclass, you're still playing "AD&D." If you've changed the cleric to a scientist, removed the thief, and completely altered the magic-user's spell casting system, you've probably left "AD&D" and have entered the realm of "D&D."
"I woke up in a Soho doorway
A policeman knew my name
He said you can go sleep at home tonight
If you can get up and walk away"

Post Reply