Ring of Free Action

Questions and discussion about AD&D rules, classes, races, monsters, magic, etc.
Post Reply
User avatar
AxeMental
Uber-Grognard
Posts: 15104
Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2005 7:38 am
Location: Florida

Ring of Free Action

Post by AxeMental »

Curious what others allow this ring to apply to (besides the spells listed). Does this work on regular giant webs or only the web spell? If it works on non-magical webs what else might it work on? For instance, would it prevent a PC wearing such a ring from being pinned by a tentacle?
"I prefer dangerous freedom over peaceful slavery."
Thomas Jefferson in letter to Madison

Back in the days when a leopard could grab and break your Australopithecus (gracile or robust) nek and drag you into the tree as a snack, mankind has never had a break"
** Stone Giant

User avatar
PapersAndPaychecks
Admin
Posts: 8881
Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2005 3:44 pm
Location: Location, Location.

Re: Ring of Free Action

Post by PapersAndPaychecks »

I let it work on things that passively resist the character's movement, but not things that actively impede it. So spider webs, entangle spells, dense thickets etc. are subject to a ring of free action but a squeezing tentacle isn't.
OSRIC
Ten years old -- and still no kickstarter!

grodog
Uber-Grognard
Posts: 12783
Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2005 11:39 pm
Location: Wichita, KS, USA
Contact:

Re: Ring of Free Action

Post by grodog »

The D/Q module question is, how does a ring of free action impact a wand of viscid blobs's blobs? I rule that they're non-functional against the PC, just like a web spell.
grodog
----
Allan Grohe
Editor and Project Manager
Black Blade Publishing
https://www.facebook.com/BlackBladePublishing/

grodog@gmail.com
http://www.greyhawkonline.com/grodog/
http://www.greyhawkonline.com/grodog/greyhawk.html for my Greyhawk site
https://grodog.blogspot.com/ for my blog, From Kuroth's Quill

User avatar
Matthew
Master of the Silver Blade
Posts: 8049
Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 4:42 pm
Location: Kanagawa, Japan
Contact:

Re: Ring of Free Action

Post by Matthew »

PapersAndPaychecks wrote: I let it work on things that passively resist the character's movement, but not things that actively impede it. So spider webs, entangle spells, dense thickets etc. are subject to a ring of free action but a squeezing tentacle isn't.
Yes, indeed. I would add the caveat, no walking through cell bars, walls, or closed doors. :D
[i]It is a joyful thing indeed to hold intimate converse with a man after one’s own heart, chatting without reserve about things of interest or the fleeting topics of the world; but such, alas, are few and far between.[/i]

– Yoshida Kenko (1283-1350), [i]Tsurezure-Gusa[/i] (1340)

User avatar
jallison86
Veteran Member
Posts: 116
Joined: Tue Jul 14, 2009 12:04 pm

Re: Ring of Free Action

Post by jallison86 »

PapersAndPaychecks wrote:I let it work on things that passively resist the character's movement, but not things that actively impede it. So spider webs, entangle spells, dense thickets etc. are subject to a ring of free action but a squeezing tentacle isn't.
I've never payed much attention to this item, but reading it now I see that it leaves a lot to the DM's discretion. BtB the only things specifically covered are actions while impacted by "web, hold, or slow spell, or even while under water." I like P&P's active vs passive ruling, but what about being tied up? Or caught in a Net of Entrapment? Snagged by a Rope of Entanglement?

- Jeff

Ska
Uber-Grognard
Posts: 1569
Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2005 2:02 pm

Re: Ring of Free Action

Post by Ska »

I look at it as the ring stopping anything that would impede the movement of the wearer of the ring that does not cause physical damage (hold, web, etc.)

A tentacle would still cause damage as it's sole function is not to hold , but to cause damage. I would rule a magic tentacle of holding would not work as it is only trying to impede.


Would be cool to see one of Axe's f-ing gnome characters picked up and being crushed by a giant octopus.

Post Reply