My least favorite gaming terms

You can talk about "almost" anything here.

Moderator: Falconer

geneweigel

Post by geneweigel »

"Tiefling"

Having thought that Planescape would be some reprieve for D&D and a couple of boxed sets and modules later all I got out of it was:

A) A repulsion for flopsy-faced monster illustrations,

B) New players coming off the street talking "the cant" ("Oi, berk!") really really had nothing better to do and

C) The "second edition" embodiment known as "tieflings". If you thought an alu-demon was a "diet succubi" then you ain't seen nothing yet!

;)

That said the "templates" of 3e gave an even freakier abomination with players wanting characters who have "angel ancestry"....

SHUDDER

;)

Glgnfz
Veteran Member
Posts: 456
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 5:03 am
Location: Near Koblenz, Germany

Post by Glgnfz »

BlackBat242 wrote:
Wheggi wrote: And Gene, that's why I renamed all the dark elves in the GDQ 'drau'. Spell it like I say it, says I. The lower level ones I call 'draulien'. All of them yell in exagerrated German accents, listen to crappy Euro disco music, and wear tight black clothing.

- Wheggi
Any of them named "Hans" or "Jeter"?

Häi. Sere's a Dschörmen hier! Änt hi never wärs tight bleck closink! :twisted:

User avatar
Benoist
Le Vrai Grognard
Posts: 2852
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2006 5:48 pm
Location: The Hobby Shop Dungeon
Contact:

Post by Benoist »

geneweigel wrote: That said the "templates" of 3e gave an even freakier abomination with players wanting characters who have "angel ancestry"...
I dunno. I don't feel that way, particularly when:
Men & Magic, p. 8 wrote:Other Character Types: There is no reason that players cannot be allowed to play as virtually anything, provided they begin relatively weak and work up to the top, i.e., a player wishing to be a Dragon would have to begin as let us say, a "young" one and progress upwards in the usual manner, steps being predetermined by the campaign referee.
Not a stab at you, really. I you can't stand it that's totally fine! That kind of stuff sure can get out of hand real quick.
Founder with Ernest Gygax, GP Adventures LLC
The Hobby Shop Dungeon Facebook page.

geneweigel

Post by geneweigel »

Heck, I don't care about "balrog players" I was just talking about that recently.

What I meant was regarding aesthetics, innapropriateness and just plain warped POV when you see these people go into action playing their "angel ancestry" characters. Depicting them with Schwarzenegger bodies and baby faces...UGH...I must be missing something to not know where this originates from. If I have to go through catering to that again I swear I'm just going to lose it! ;)

User avatar
thedungeondelver
Intergalactic demander
Posts: 9798
Joined: Sat Sep 10, 2005 7:40 am
Location: ameriʞa

Post by thedungeondelver »

Ah...I was guilty of once wanting "exalted" characters in my game(s). Fortunately I snapped out of it and laid such foolishness back at the feet of White Wolf and walked back onto the correct path.

Half- things bug me, too. Half-dragon. Half-Aasimar. Half-grey ooze/half kobold.

Half Elves get a pass because hey, Elrond. Half orcs get one too because hey, they'll get with anything.
"Peace Is Our Profession"
"Relativism is flatfooted, and orthodoxy packs one hell of a punch." - Kellri
you pretend to be living inside a classic fairy tale
Jump up my ass, you strange mother fucker.

Image

User avatar
koga305
Member
Posts: 37
Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2009 8:52 am

Post by koga305 »

3, 3.5, and 4 8)

User avatar
Wheggi
Sly Pimp
Posts: 7963
Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2005 10:39 pm
Location: Land of Cheese and Snow

Post by Wheggi »

koga305 wrote:2, 3, 3.5, and 4 8)
Fix'd it for ya.

- Wheggi

NOW PLAYING ON RADIO WHGI: "My New World" by Transatlantic
The Twisting Stair
An old school role-playing game periodical with a focus on adventure design

Stephen Colbert: “What would you do, when coming up with your character you roll six rolls of three six-sided dice to come up with your character”

Joe Magliano: “There’s a new way now where you roll 4d6 and you take away the lowest.”

Stephen Colbert: “Really? That’s for children!”

User avatar
koga305
Member
Posts: 37
Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2009 8:52 am

Post by koga305 »

Wheggi wrote:
koga305 wrote:2, 3, 3.5, and 4 8)
Fix'd it for ya.

- Wheggi

NOW PLAYING ON RADIO WHGI: "My New World" by Transatlantic
Uh... I actually think 2 is OK (although 1e and basic are much better).

User avatar
yesmar
Member
Posts: 37
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2007 8:38 pm
Location: Bellevue, WA
Contact:

Post by yesmar »

Uh... I actually think 2 is OK (although 1e and basic are much better).
Roll for initiative.

Just kiddin'! ;-)
"Under the crimson, primordial sky, surrounded by the jagged black rocks of the ancient volcanic mountain, the wretched Warlock reached into the dark embrace of the fissure until his hand touched a smooth glassy surface. Cold as ice, his fist closed around The Serpent's Eye. Slowly he withdrew it and held it before him in the fading light of the blood red suns. It glowed from within. A ghostly emerald light. Strange and Eternal." — Seeker of the Serpent's Eye, Lenora Tor

User avatar
Random
Grognard
Posts: 783
Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2008 4:41 pm
Location: Arkansas, USA

Post by Random »

Wheggi wrote:
koga305 wrote:2, 3, 3.5, and 4 8)
Fix'd it for ya.
At least 2E people tend to enjoy AD&D, unlike the majority of 3E people.
(In this context, "*E people" refers to people who began playing *E before other versions or derivatives of the game)

I dislike the term THAC0. It's a pointless mechanic :wink: since you can simply track attack roll bonuses instead, subtracting the modified attack roll from 20 and comparing to opponent AC. (Of course, in AD&D you have to add that +5 for an attack roll of 20.)

Even though I use it all the time for clarity, I also dislike the term OD&D. It's the original, so why does it need a special label? It's DUNGEONS & DRAGONS, simple as that.

Another that annoys me (and I'm reaching for blasphemy here) is campaign. It seems that everyone is always out to "start a new campaign" or "develop their campaign" when what really mean is that they are wanting to get some guys together for a simple D&D game or pen down a bunch of make-believe jibber-jabber. I find it odd to make a huge fuss about a long-term game when your actual goal is getting together anything at all for the short-term.

Storyteller, bleh!

There are probably many others.

User avatar
Malcadon
Veteran Member
Posts: 214
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2008 8:14 am
Location: In the Depths of Madness!!!
Contact:

Post by Malcadon »

Tolkienesque
The Big Model/GNS Theory/Threefold Model (quit theorizing, and just play the damn game!)
+1 Sword (or any other generic magic item that is defined by a bonus)
Roll-playing
"New Wave" role-playing games
Godmoding
Dungeon Crawl/Bash
LARP
Hack and Slash
The "D&D Experience"
Convention Gaming

User avatar
Algolei
(within reason)
Posts: 848
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 4:10 pm

Post by Algolei »

I get this from my 3.5E players: "One dice, two dies."

No! It's one die, two dice!!
In Whatever, I Distrust.
Git yer [url=http://zapatopi.net/afdb/]aluminum foil deflector beanies[/url] -- 'cause you can never be too sure!

User avatar
Flight Commander Solitude
Veteran Member
Posts: 226
Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2008 8:42 pm

Post by Flight Commander Solitude »

LOL! In any argument between grammar and people, grammar loses.

Ragnorakk
Uber-Grognard
Posts: 1132
Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2009 7:24 pm
Location: City of Terrors

Post by Ragnorakk »

dungeonpunk :evil:
makes me want to kill kill kill!

James Maliszewski

Post by James Maliszewski »

I vote for "the awesome," especially when it's spelled "teh awesome." "Shiny" as a noun also annoys me.

Post Reply