Opinion on shocking grasp use

Questions and discussion about AD&D rules, classes, races, monsters, magic, etc.
Post Reply
User avatar
AxeMental
Uber-Grognard
Posts: 15108
Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2005 7:38 am
Location: Florida

Opinion on shocking grasp use

Post by AxeMental »

Would you allow a MU to cast this spell on a body of water (lets say he's in a boat) to fry those in the water (rather then having to hit the creature). Also, what area do you think it would effect (a few feet, 5 feet)? I've always allowed those in the water to be effected with an automatic hit (if he's able to reach the water and is close enough to the target(s) so a few feet from where the hand touches the surface of the water. Your opinion?
"I prefer dangerous freedom over peaceful slavery."
Thomas Jefferson in letter to Madison

Back in the days when a leopard could grab and break your Australopithecus (gracile or robust) nek and drag you into the tree as a snack, mankind has never had a break"
** Stone Giant

grodog
Uber-Grognard
Posts: 12783
Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2005 11:39 pm
Location: Wichita, KS, USA
Contact:

Re: Opinion on shocking grasp use

Post by grodog »

I'd rule this to follow the spirit of the changes for lightning bolt in an underwater environ (DMG p 57). So, in your example of discharging the spell from a boat at the water's surface, I'd probably allow this to affect a 10' diameter hemisphere 5' deep at its center (deepest point). If discharged fully underwater, I'd probably go with a 5' radius spherical effect (which might affect the caster too, come to think of it....). (And no, I have no idea if those are comparable in area of effect or not ;) ).
grodog
----
Allan Grohe
Editor and Project Manager
Black Blade Publishing
https://www.facebook.com/BlackBladePublishing/

grodog@gmail.com
http://www.greyhawkonline.com/grodog/
http://www.greyhawkonline.com/grodog/greyhawk.html for my Greyhawk site
https://grodog.blogspot.com/ for my blog, From Kuroth's Quill

User avatar
TRP
Uber-Grognard
Posts: 13023
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 5:14 pm

Re: Opinion on shocking grasp use

Post by TRP »

Nah, I'd rule not enough differential in all that water.
"The cave you fear to enter holds the treasure you seek." - Joseph Campbell

User avatar
deathsdj
Veteran Member
Posts: 122
Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2011 8:11 pm

Re: Opinion on shocking grasp use

Post by deathsdj »

I would let it still work in the water but it is only going to affect one enemy. Whoever is closest and if no one is within 10' then no effect.

Cheers!

MJW

Guy Fullerton
Uber-Grognard
Posts: 1359
Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2009 2:57 pm

Re: Opinion on shocking grasp use

Post by Guy Fullerton »

grodog wrote:I'd rule this to follow the spirit of the changes for lightning bolt in an underwater environ (DMG p 57). So, in your example of discharging the spell from a boat at the water's surface, I'd probably allow this to affect a 10' diameter hemisphere 5' deep at its center (deepest point). If discharged fully underwater, I'd probably go with a 5' radius spherical effect (which might affect the caster too, come to think of it....). (And no, I have no idea if those are comparable in area of effect or not ;) ).
I agree with this approach, but I'd be more inclined to use burning hands as inspiration for the affected area. (Maybe even for damage too. But only maybe.)
Guy Fullerton
Chaotic Henchmen Productions
http://www.chaotichenchmen.com/

francisca
Peon of the Vile Rune Tribe
Posts: 9113
Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2005 11:07 am

Re: Opinion on shocking grasp use

Post by francisca »

I'm with Alan, though I think given the relative power of the spell, nor more than a 3-1/3 foot radius.

User avatar
Corwwyn
Member
Posts: 67
Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2011 3:58 am

Re: Opinion on shocking grasp use

Post by Corwwyn »

I would allow an area of effect. Have a look at electric eels on youtube. That's probably the principle I'd go by...

:shock:

Post Reply