Page 3 of 3

Re: Light underground and surprise.

Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2011 6:28 pm
by Philotomy Jurament
sepulchre wrote:Philotomy, I'm not in disagreement with this reading, but I have always found a measure of ambiguity or obscurity in how to read a thief's additional attack when surprising from behind. Do you know of a BTB reference for that reading. To be honest I prefer your reading, but I know players who would interpret each additional attack/surprise segment as a backstab...
No, I don't know of a BTB reference that locks this down. It seems to be a gray area that's open to interpretation. I did find the Sage Advice question/answer, in Dragon 139:
Dragon 139 Sage Advice wrote:If a thief using two weapons makes a back attack, does he get his “to hit” and damage modifiers for both weapons?
The + 4 “to hit” and the damage multiplier only apply to the first blow; the second weapon gets the +2 “to hit” modifier for a rear attack but no damage modifier. The same holds true if the thief gets multiple attacks due to surprise.
That's probably as close to official as we'll get (even though it's an answer under Skip Williams' byline). :lol:

Re: Light underground and surprise.

Posted: Tue Oct 25, 2011 7:08 am
by sepulchre
Thanks Philotomy (Skip Williams and all)! I was familiar with this Sage Advice entry, but had missed that concluding sentence.