Opinion on shocking grasp use
Opinion on shocking grasp use
Would you allow a MU to cast this spell on a body of water (lets say he's in a boat) to fry those in the water (rather then having to hit the creature). Also, what area do you think it would effect (a few feet, 5 feet)? I've always allowed those in the water to be effected with an automatic hit (if he's able to reach the water and is close enough to the target(s) so a few feet from where the hand touches the surface of the water. Your opinion?
"I prefer dangerous freedom over peaceful slavery."
Thomas Jefferson in letter to Madison
Back in the days when a leopard could grab and break your Australopithecus (gracile or robust) nek and drag you into the tree as a snack, mankind has never had a break"
** Stone Giant
Thomas Jefferson in letter to Madison
Back in the days when a leopard could grab and break your Australopithecus (gracile or robust) nek and drag you into the tree as a snack, mankind has never had a break"
** Stone Giant
-
grodog
- Uber-Grognard
- Posts: 12783
- Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2005 11:39 pm
- Location: Wichita, KS, USA
- Contact:
Re: Opinion on shocking grasp use
I'd rule this to follow the spirit of the changes for lightning bolt in an underwater environ (DMG p 57). So, in your example of discharging the spell from a boat at the water's surface, I'd probably allow this to affect a 10' diameter hemisphere 5' deep at its center (deepest point). If discharged fully underwater, I'd probably go with a 5' radius spherical effect (which might affect the caster too, come to think of it....). (And no, I have no idea if those are comparable in area of effect or not
).
grodog
----
Allan Grohe
Editor and Project Manager
Black Blade Publishing
https://www.facebook.com/BlackBladePublishing/
grodog@gmail.com
http://www.greyhawkonline.com/grodog/
http://www.greyhawkonline.com/grodog/greyhawk.html for my Greyhawk site
https://grodog.blogspot.com/ for my blog, From Kuroth's Quill
----
Allan Grohe
Editor and Project Manager
Black Blade Publishing
https://www.facebook.com/BlackBladePublishing/
grodog@gmail.com
http://www.greyhawkonline.com/grodog/
http://www.greyhawkonline.com/grodog/greyhawk.html for my Greyhawk site
https://grodog.blogspot.com/ for my blog, From Kuroth's Quill
Re: Opinion on shocking grasp use
Nah, I'd rule not enough differential in all that water.
"The cave you fear to enter holds the treasure you seek." - Joseph Campbell
Re: Opinion on shocking grasp use
I would let it still work in the water but it is only going to affect one enemy. Whoever is closest and if no one is within 10' then no effect.
Cheers!
MJW
Cheers!
MJW
-
Guy Fullerton
- Uber-Grognard
- Posts: 1359
- Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2009 2:57 pm
Re: Opinion on shocking grasp use
I agree with this approach, but I'd be more inclined to use burning hands as inspiration for the affected area. (Maybe even for damage too. But only maybe.)grodog wrote:I'd rule this to follow the spirit of the changes for lightning bolt in an underwater environ (DMG p 57). So, in your example of discharging the spell from a boat at the water's surface, I'd probably allow this to affect a 10' diameter hemisphere 5' deep at its center (deepest point). If discharged fully underwater, I'd probably go with a 5' radius spherical effect (which might affect the caster too, come to think of it....). (And no, I have no idea if those are comparable in area of effect or not).
Guy Fullerton
Chaotic Henchmen Productions
http://www.chaotichenchmen.com/
Chaotic Henchmen Productions
http://www.chaotichenchmen.com/
Re: Opinion on shocking grasp use
I'm with Alan, though I think given the relative power of the spell, nor more than a 3-1/3 foot radius.
Re: Opinion on shocking grasp use
I would allow an area of effect. Have a look at electric eels on youtube. That's probably the principle I'd go by...