Or ... as my pappy always put it: son, that's why Baskin-Robbins has 31 flavors ...Flambeaux wrote:De gustibus and all that.
STAR TREK **MAJOR SPOILERS**
Moderator: Falconer
-
geneweigel
Ferrell is hard to swallow sometimes but its misleading how one moment he is right on the heart of something truly funny and the next moment seemingly lost for all time. That said TALLADEGA and STEPBROTHERS are good films for his good moments but there are some shabby moments.
I watched SB one afternoon and got hammered with my buddy. We laughed like crazy. The next time, a few weeks later, when my wife heard about what a good time we had watching it from his wife, well, you could have heard a pin drop. Her response soured me out so much that I wasn't even laughing anymore. A bunch of guys came over again and it happened to be in the dvd player when somebody was fucking around with it and we all started laughing at it.
I watched SB one afternoon and got hammered with my buddy. We laughed like crazy. The next time, a few weeks later, when my wife heard about what a good time we had watching it from his wife, well, you could have heard a pin drop. Her response soured me out so much that I wasn't even laughing anymore. A bunch of guys came over again and it happened to be in the dvd player when somebody was fucking around with it and we all started laughing at it.
"Talladega" was showing free on Encore a month or two ago ... even for free I couldn't watch it, after 5 boring minutes I turned it off. Of course, as "Star Trek" showed us (OOTC*), humor is like beauty ... and is in the eye of the beholder.geneweigel wrote:Ferrell is hard to swallow sometimes but its misleading how one moment he is right on the heart of something truly funny and the next moment seemingly lost for all time. That said TALLADEGA and STEPBROTHERS are good films for his good moments but there are some shabby moments.
-----
*Obligatory On-Topic Comment
-
geneweigel
I was a Will Ferrell hater too once until I joined the club.Piper wrote:"Talladega" was showing free on Encore a month or two ago ... even for free I couldn't watch it, after 5 boring minutes I turned it off. Of course, as "Star Trek" showed us (OOTC*), humor is like beauty ... and is in the eye of the beholder.geneweigel wrote:Ferrell is hard to swallow sometimes but its misleading how one moment he is right on the heart of something truly funny and the next moment seemingly lost for all time. That said TALLADEGA and STEPBROTHERS are good films for his good moments but there are some shabby moments.
-----
*Obligatory On-Topic Comment
You are not one with the fancy sauce!
Will Ferrell's movies are mostly lame, but this sketch from his SNL days continues to crack my shit up
(P.S. haven't seen "Star Trek")
(P.S. haven't seen "Star Trek")
The Mystical Trash Heap - blog about D&D and other 80s pop-culture
The Heroic Legendarium - my book of 1E-compatible rules expansions and modifications, now available for sale at DriveThruRPG
The Heroic Legendarium - my book of 1E-compatible rules expansions and modifications, now available for sale at DriveThruRPG
-
geneweigel
His humor is fine but you just probably happened to catch him on off days its just when he's crippled with bad content (SNL's tendency to appeal to mediocrity) or bland co-stars (Queen Latifah, etc) he just loses it.
Honestly? Ferrell's flute scene in ANCHORMAN almost made me cry blood I was laughing so hard.
Honestly? Ferrell's flute scene in ANCHORMAN almost made me cry blood I was laughing so hard.
Perhaps. I won't say he has never done anything I've enjoyed, but I think it says a lot that I won't even watch his films when they are showing on the cable movie channels.geneweigel wrote:His humor is fine but you just probably happened to catch him on off days its just when he's crippled with bad content (SNL's tendency to appeal to mediocrity) or bland co-stars (Queen Latifah, etc) he just loses it.
- Thoth Amon
- Veteran Member
- Posts: 328
- Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2005 4:23 am
- Location: Norfolk, VA
- Contact:
I don't have cable (or an antenna) but I surely won't watch his stuff on video. I have not seen SNL in probably 15 years so if I saw him previously, I don't remember. The few movies I've seen with him bored me to tears so, like Piper, I won't even watch a movie with him in it, now.Piper wrote:Perhaps. I won't say he has never done anything I've enjoyed, but I think it says a lot that I won't even watch his films when they are showing on the cable movie channels.geneweigel wrote:His humor is fine but you just probably happened to catch him on off days its just when he's crippled with bad content (SNL's tendency to appeal to mediocrity) or bland co-stars (Queen Latifah, etc) he just loses it.
"My daughter is easy to raise. I drink because I am, after all, a married man."
--Geoffrey
--Geoffrey
Falconer, I agree with every point you bring up (except perhaps the "all-action, special effects" comment, what the hells wrong with special effects and action).Falconer wrote:Saw it tonight with the wife. We thought it was lame. All special-effects action. None of the heart of the original. McCoy was lost in the crowd of half-baked characters. The ship was too large (you could never see the entire bridge, for example) so it was impossible to feel like you were there with them as part of the crew, which was a lot of the fun of the original. The feel was cleanly opposite of the “the adults are in charge” feel of the old Kirk and Spock and McCoy and Scotty, and everything happened by coincidence instead of by naval discipline. Spock was moody/angsty/emo the whole movie, so there was no dramatic payoff when his emotional dam completely burst, or when Sarek talked about love, etc.
I dunno, maybe sequels will be okay since they won’t be under such pressure to deliver a no-stops “epic” spectacle, if it’s part of a series.
When I say its good, its in the context of all the Trek thats been made over time (particularly in contrast to the TNG movies). If you comparing it to ONLY the original show, sure the original blows this out of the water IMHO.
"I prefer dangerous freedom over peaceful slavery."
Thomas Jefferson in letter to Madison
Back in the days when a leopard could grab and break your Australopithecus (gracile or robust) nek and drag you into the tree as a snack, mankind has never had a break"
** Stone Giant
Thomas Jefferson in letter to Madison
Back in the days when a leopard could grab and break your Australopithecus (gracile or robust) nek and drag you into the tree as a snack, mankind has never had a break"
** Stone Giant
I prefer his humor in films where he's not main character. I enjoyed him in The Producers and his turn as Mugatu in Zoolander was, IMO, brilliant and funny.Piper wrote:Perhaps. I won't say he has never done anything I've enjoyed, but I think it says a lot that I won't even watch his films when they are showing on the cable movie channels.geneweigel wrote:His humor is fine but you just probably happened to catch him on off days its just when he's crippled with bad content (SNL's tendency to appeal to mediocrity) or bland co-stars (Queen Latifah, etc) he just loses it.
While I enjoyed Talladega Nights, I don't know that I ever need to watch it again.
I think he's best in bit parts, cameos, and supporting characters.
And now I'll walk away from this threadjack and let y'all get back to talking about the new Star Trek movie which I haven't seen.
- Falconer
- Global moderator
- Posts: 7660
- Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2006 1:21 am
- Location: Northwest Indiana
- Contact:
We're on the same page there. However, it is with TOS that the movie itself invites comparison, due to using those characters. It certainly beats TOS in terms of action/effects, but does that trump all? You clearly don't think so and neither do I.AxeMental wrote:Falconer, I agree with every point you bring up (except perhaps the "all-action, special effects" comment, what the hells wrong with special effects and action).
When I say its good, its in the context of all the Trek thats been made over time (particularly in contrast to the TNG movies). If you comparing it to ONLY the original show, sure the original blows this out of the water IMHO.
Special-effects action should be icing on the cake, not the whole excuse for the movie. They could have cut out that scene with Scotty shooting through the water tubes, and added one honest-to-goodness Kirk/Spock/McCoy philosophical discussion.
RPG Pop Club Star Trek Tabletop Adventure Reviews