Wizardawn wrote:OSRIC has tons of misspellings. It's "armor" not "armour"!
You kids say the darndest things these days!
Moderator: Falconer
Wizardawn wrote:OSRIC has tons of misspellings. It's "armor" not "armour"!
Cracking me up today, you are.Wizardawn wrote:OSRIC has tons of misspellings. It's "armor" not "armour"!
We just de-French-ified some parts. An improvement, really!PapersAndPaychecks wrote:How cruelly you mangle my beautiful language.Wizardawn wrote:OSRIC has tons of misspellings. It's "armor" not "armour"!
EOTB wrote:AD&D will never again be "out of print".
Question to Stuart: Did you and Matt fight, in OSRIC's nascency, over which spelling convention to use?Matthew wrote:The use of proper English spellings in OSRIC is really what elevates it above all other extant simulacrums.
SIMULACRA!!!Matthew wrote:The use of proper English spellings in OSRIC is really what elevates it above all other extant simulacrums.
I'm not sure where OSRIC stands on the central issue confronting the roleplaying game world: Do dwarf women have beards? - but it is firmly in favour of 'dwarfs' over 'dwarves'.Matthew wrote:The use of proper English spellings in OSRIC is really what elevates it above all other extant simulacrums.
Tolkien and Gygax can’t be wrong.Kellri wrote:Do dwarf women have beards?
+1Falconer wrote:Tolkien and Gygax can’t be wrong.Kellri wrote:Do dwarf women have beards?